ƶ Free 喻 Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing download pdf ჷ Kindle Author Miranda Fricker ᄢ

ƶ Free 喻 Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing download pdf ჷ Kindle Author Miranda Fricker ᄢ ƶ Free 喻 Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing download pdf ჷ Kindle Author Miranda Fricker ᄢ an exciting examination of a widespread problem that is rarely discussed in such terms so that it can be understood and communicated, and perhaps, someday, solved Feminist Review An original and stimulating contribution to contemporary epistemology There is much to admire in Fricker s book It is clear, well written and well structured The explanations and arguments are rigorous without being overly technical, and the illustrations are interesting and felicitous In particular, the book constitutes a striking example of how contemporary epistemology can be enriched by a close attention to our experiences, and of how our understanding of epistemic matters can be deepened through the deployment of ideas from ethics, plitical theory and feminist philosophy As a result, Epistemic Injustice makes a significant contribution, not just to epistemology, but to all of the disciplines Michael Brady, Analysis Reviews Fricker s Epistemic Injustice constitutes a systematic attempt to explicate epistemic injustice, articulate the harm it inevitably causes, and expound its remedy In these goals, Fricker is largely successful In an often gripping manner, Fricker cuts across philosophical subdisciplines in order to expose some of the sinister aspects of our epistemic practices For anyone interested in ethics, epostemology, or social and political philosophy, this is surely a must read Francesco Pupa, Metaphilosophy Miranda Fricker s excellent monograph occupies some relatively uncharted philosophical territory, being neither straightforwardly a work of ethics nor straightforwardly a work of epistemology , but instead seeking to renegotiate a stretch of the border between these two regions her discussion is outstandingly lucid and persuasivethe book is an admirable reminder of what can be accomplished in under two hundred pages of crisp yet free flowing philosophical prose It deserves, and will surely command, widespread attention Sabina Lovibond, Philosophy excellent snd well argued bookThis is an important and timely book, argued with care and illustrated with detailed and compelling examplesthis is an exemplary discussion of the intersection of knowledge and power Kathleen Lennon The Philosophical Quarterly This is a wonderful book not just for social or feminist epistemologists, but for the discipline as a whole Fricker succeeds admirably in achieving her main goal of offering a detailed and wide ranging ethical and epistemological analysis of testimonial injusticeMoreover, the book is beautifully written Martin Kusch MIND Bold and well argued a rich and elegantly written study Anyone whose philosophical interest in the concept of knowledge extends beyond merely definitional issues, and addresses its ethical and political dimensions as well as its genealogy, can ill afford to ignore this book Axel Gelfert, Times Literary Supplement In this elegantly crafted book, Miranda Fricker s timely project of looking at the negative space that is epistemic injustice comes to fruitionthis is a path breaking study With this book Miranda Fricker has opened space for the new meanings the squarely political analysis will require Her readers will look forward to the next phase of this creative, vitally important project Lorraine Code, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews In this elegant and ground breaking work, Fricker names the phenomenon of epistemic injustice, and distinguishes two central forms of it, with their two corresponding remedies As the title conveys, Fricker is working in the newly fertile borderland between theories of value and of knowledge We are social creatures something that tends to be forgotten by traditional analytic epistemology We are also knowers something that tends to be forgotten by power obsessed postmodern theorizing Fricker steers a careful passage between the Scylla of the one and the Charybdis of the other The book is not only a wonderful, ambitious attempt to bring ethics and epistemology together in a way that has rarely been done before, it is also a beautiful, and powerful, attempt to name something that matters What progress, to be able to name the enemy, be it sexual harassment or epistemic injustice Rae Langton, HypatiaEpistemic Injustice explores the idea that there is a distinctively epistemic kind of injustice injustice which consists in a wrong done to someone specifically in their capacity as a knower Miranda Fricker distinguishes two forms of epistemic injustice testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice Testimonial injustice occurs when prejudice causes a hearer to give a deflated level of credibility to a speaker s word as in the case where the police do not believe someone because he is black Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, occurs when a gap in collective interpretative resources puts someone at an unfair disadvantage when it comes to making sense of their social experiences A central case of this sort of injustice is found in the example of a woman who suffers sexual harassment prior to the time when we acquired this critical concept, so that she cannot properly comprehend her own experience, let alone render it communicatively intelligible to others In connection with each of these forms of epistemic injustice, Fricker develops the idea that our testimonial sensibility needs to incorporate a corrective, anti prejudicial virtue that can be used to promote a veridical and a democratic epistemic practice Epistemology as it has traditionally been pursued has been impoverished by the lack of any theoretical framework conducive to revealing the ethical and political aspects of our epistemic conduct Epistemic Injustice shows that virtue epistemology provides a general epistemological idiom in which these issues can be fruitfully and forcefully discussed. Here a curious thing The ideal Bayesian reasons about all contingent cases just as she lottery If the reasoning doesn t yield knowledge in ie if can know that won win , it anyMiranda Fricker Graduate Center, CUNY City University of New York Established Center CUNY is devoted primarily to doctoral studies and awards most s degrees An internationally recognized center for advanced national model public education, Wikipedia Miranda Fricker, FBA born March an English philosopher who currently Presidential Professor Philosophy at She also Research part time Profile Profiles People Professional Roles here Sheffield co leader research project with Prof Boudewijn de Bruin Groningen entitled Towards Epistemic Justice Finance Medicine, funded Epistemic Injustice Power Ethics Knowing Abstract one oldest central themes philosophy, but sometimes we would do well focus instead on injustice In epistemology, very idea there first order ethical dimension our epistemic practices such York, Department, Faculty Member Studies Moral Blame, Forgiveness, Author Goodreads author avg rating, ratings, reviews, published Cambridge Companion Feminism P Ethics this exploration new territory between ethics argues distinctively type injustice, which someone wronged specifically their capacity knower philosophy bites Injustice interview book topic, explains notion testimonial This special kind arises when wrongly Knowing, Oxford Press pp hbk ISBN Reviewed by Lorraine Code, elegantly crafted book, timely looking negative space Knowing Contents Introduction Testimonial Identity Central Case Prejudice Credibility Economy Stereotypes Prejudicial without Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing


    • Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
    • 1.2
    • 25
    • Relié
    • 208 pages
    • 0199570523
    • Miranda Fricker
    • Anglais
    • 07 July 2017

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *